99 OVERALL
← All Breakdowns

The Sack That Wasn't His Fault — Lawrence Process vs Result

Trevor Lawrence·QB·2nd & 8, Q3

Video coming soon

Grade

66.4

Process

88.2

Result

31.5

What We See On Film

0:00

Pre-Snap — Cover 3 Identified

Single high safety, corners at 7 yards with outside leverage. Lawrence sees Cover 3 and knows the dig route behind the linebackers is the best bet.

Coverage Read86
1
0:02

Snap — First Read

Eyes go to the corner route on the boundary. The corner is carrying it — not open. This is correct: check the deep shot first.

Read Progression88
2
0:03

Second Read — Dig Route Opening

Eyes come inside to the dig. The linebacker is dropping to the hook zone but the dig is breaking behind him. Window is opening.

Target Selection85
3
0:04

Feet Set — Ready to Throw

Weight transfers to the front foot. Platform is clean. The ball is about to come out. This is textbook footwork for a rhythm throw.

Footwork / Base90
4
0:05

The Breakdown — OT Gets Beat

Right tackle gets beat inside by a spin move. The rusher is now in the lap. Lawrence never sees it because his eyes are downfield — which is correct.

Pocket Navigation72
5
0:06

Sack + Fumble

Rusher arrives as Lawrence loads. Strip sack. The stat line reads: sack, fumble, -8 yards. The process was above average. The result was a disaster.

Completion / Accuracy10
6

The Full Picture

This is why GRADE+ separates Process from Result. The stat line says Lawrence took a sack for -8 yards. PFF will ding him. But watch the film: Lawrence correctly identifies Cover 3, sees the single-high safety rotate late, and targets the dig route that has beaten the zone. His read progression is textbook — first read (corner route, covered), second read (dig route, opening). His feet are set, the throw window is there for about 0.4 seconds. But the right tackle gets beat inside by a spin move. The rusher arrives as Lawrence loads up. Sack. Fumble. Disaster on the stat sheet. But the Process score is 88 — above average bordering on elite. He saw the defense correctly, made the right read, had his feet set. The offensive line failed him. GRADE+ shows this. The Result score is 31 (sack + fumble = floor rule, capped at 44, but the actual outcome metrics drag it down). Final grade: 66. Not great, but not the catastrophe the box score suggests.

What To Look For

This is the Process vs Result gap in action. When you see a big gap between Process and Result (88 vs 31 here), ask: was the player let down by his teammates, or did he create the problem? The film always tells you.

process-resultprotectioneducationalsack

Want to grade plays yourself?

Every slider shows what each score means on film.

Start Grading